From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young Americans for Freedom, Inc. v. Rusk

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 6, 1962
303 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1962)

Opinion

No. 16894.

March 6, 1962.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

On appellant's motion to reverse and remand and on appellee's motion to affirm.

Mr. Thomas M. O'Malley, Washington, D.C., was on the motion for appellant.

Messrs. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Gil Zimmerman, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the motion for appellee.

Before BAZELON and BURGER, Circuit Judges, in Chambers.


Upon consideration of appellant's motion to reverse and remand and petition for immediate hearing, of appellee's opposition and of appellee's motion to affirm the judgment of the District Court, 205 F. Supp. 603, it is

ORDERED by the court that appellant's motion to reverse and remand is denied.

It is FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellee's motion to affirm is granted and that the judgment of the District Court appealed from herein is affirmed.


Summaries of

Young Americans for Freedom, Inc. v. Rusk

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Mar 6, 1962
303 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Case details for

Young Americans for Freedom, Inc. v. Rusk

Case Details

Full title:YOUNG AMERICANS FOR FREEDOM, INC., Appellant, v. Dean RUSK, Individually…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 1962

Citations

303 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
113 U.S. App. D.C. 6

Citing Cases

Cobb v. Murrell

350 F.2d at 707. See also the following relevant cases: Texas State AFL-CIO v. Kennedy, 1964, 117…

Braude v. Wirtz

Allegations of similar and as serious economic injury have previously been held insufficient to support…