Opinion
CASE NO. 4:13CV1116
08-25-2014
CYNTHIA M. YOST, PLAINTIFF, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 19.) Under the relevant statute:
Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. [. . .]28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The R&R was filed on March 31, 2014. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), an additional three days are added when computing service. Therefore, objections were due by April 17, 2014.
No objections were filed on or before that deadline. The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of any issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and accepts the same. Accordingly, the Court concludes that the Commissioner's decision to deny plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act was supported by substantial evidence and must be AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 25, 2014
/s/_________
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE