From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yorkes v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1988
142 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

July 11, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified by reinstating the fifth cause of action against Ross to the extent that it sought a judgment declaring that the partnership had wound up its affairs; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In March of 1980 the plaintiffs and the defendant Gerald Ross entered into an investment advisory partnership. According to the plaintiffs, this partnership was dissolved by a majority vote on October 9, 1985. Ross subsequently brought suit in the name of the partnership to recover a $7,000 debt it was owed. The plaintiffs commenced this action for, inter alia, an injunction preventing Ross from prosecuting his action, a judgment declaring that, aside from the suit Ross had brought, the partnership had wound up its affairs, and an injunction to prevent Ross from bringing any further claims in the name of the partnership.

When a partnership is dissolved, it is not terminated until the partnership affairs are wound up (see, Partnership Law § 61). Dissolution terminates a partner's authority to act for the partnership except to the extent necessary to wind up partnership affairs (see, Partnership Law § 64). Any partner who has not wrongfully dissolved the partnership has the right to wind up partnership affairs "provided * * * that any partner * * * upon cause shown, may obtain winding up by the court" (see, Partnership Law § 68). The plaintiffs do not contend that Ross wrongfully dissolved the partnership, so he was within his rights in prosecuting a collection action on behalf of the partnership. Therefore the hearing court properly dismissed the plaintiffs' second cause of action.

However, the plaintiffs' fifth cause of action, to the extent that it sought a declaration with respect to the winding up of the partnership's activities, should be reinstated. The Partnership Law permits partners to seek a winding up by the court and the partners are entitled to seek a judgment declaring that the partnership's activities had been wound up (see, CPLR 3001, 3017 [b]; Partnership Law § 68). Brown, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Yorkes v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1988
142 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Yorkes v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR S. YORKES et al., Appellants, v. GERALD ROSS et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1988

Citations

142 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
530 N.Y.S.2d 590

Citing Cases

Vogel v. TakeOne Network Corp.

relate to an attempt to recover partnership assets, so at this stage the Court is persuaded that they can be…

Scholastic Inc. v. Harris

The filing of the lawsuit in a partnership at will could, of course, constitute a notification by Plaintiffs…