From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

York v. York

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jan 14, 2014
4 N.E.3d 370 (N.Y. 2014)

Opinion

2014-01-14

Esther YORK, Appellant, v. Joseph YORK, Respondent.

Newman & Greenberg, New York City (Richard A. Greenberg, William J. Dobie and Gustave H. Newman of counsel), for appellant. Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP, New York City (Franklyn H. Snitow of counsel), for respondent.


Newman & Greenberg, New York City (Richard A. Greenberg, William J. Dobie and Gustave H. Newman of counsel), for appellant. Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP, New York City (Franklyn H. Snitow of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The order below was not an abuse of discretion. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.


Summaries of

York v. York

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jan 14, 2014
4 N.E.3d 370 (N.Y. 2014)
Case details for

York v. York

Case Details

Full title:Esther YORK, Appellant, v. Joseph YORK, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jan 14, 2014

Citations

4 N.E.3d 370 (N.Y. 2014)
22 N.Y.3d 1051
981 N.Y.S.2d 358
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 178