From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

York v. York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 2001
285 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued June 6, 2001.

July 9, 2001.

In an action, inter alia, for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated May 17, 2000, which denied her motion to disqualify the defendant's counsel.

Esther York, Holliswood, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Snitow Cunningham, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Franklyn H. Snitow of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to disqualify the defendant's counsel (see, S S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v. 777 S.H. Corp., 69 N.Y.2d 437, 443; Olmoz v. Town of Fishkill, 258 A.D.2d 447).

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

York v. York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 2001
285 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

York v. York

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER YORK, appellant, v. JOSEPH YORK, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 9, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 653

Citing Cases

Emile v. Big Bros./Big Sisters of New York City, Inc.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Ellerin, Lerner, JJ. Under all of the circumstances of this case…