Opinion
28807-21S
05-16-2022
ORDER
MAURICE B. FOLEY CHIEF JUDGE
Petitioner filed the petition in this case on August 25, 2021, seeking review of a notice of deficiency issued to petitioner for tax year 2019. On January 19, 2022, petitioner filed a First Amended Petition. However, further review indicates that petitioner's First Amended Petition appears to be more akin to a Motion To Dismiss.
In a deficiency case where the Court has jurisdiction, Internal Revenue Code section 7459(d) generally requires the Court to enter a decision as to the amount of the deficiency, if any. Settles v. Commissioner, 138 T.C. 372, 374 (2012). Because this case is based on a notice of deficiency, the Court is required to enter a decision and, accordingly, the petition in this case may not be withdrawn with or without prejudice.
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that petitioner's First Amended Petition, filed January 19, 2022, is recharacterized as petitioner's Motion To Dismiss. It is further
ORDERED that petitioner's Motion To Dismiss is denied. It is further
ORDERED that, on or before June 6, 2022, the parties shall either (1) submit stipulated decision documents so this case may be concluded, or (2) file status reports (preferably a joint report) with the Court concerning the then-present status of this case.
The Court encourages all litigants to register for electronic access (eAccess) so that they may electronically file and view documents in their Tax Court cases. If you currently file in paper and/or receive paper service from the Court, you are encouraged to register for eAccess by emailing dawson.support@ustaxcourt.gov. If you are not currently registered for eAccess, please do not attempt to electronically file documents in a pending case without first contacting dawson.support@ustaxcourt.gov. 1