From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yohe v. Safe Haven Sec. Servs.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
Jul 26, 2024
C. A. 4:23-cv-6796-JDA-TER (D.S.C. Jul. 26, 2024)

Opinion

C. A. 4:23-cv-6796-JDA-TER

07-26-2024

STACEY L. YOHE, Plaintiff, v. SAFE HAVEN SECURITY SERVICES, LLC, Defendant.


RULE 502(d) PROTECTIVE ORDER

THOMAS E. ROGERS, III UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presently before the Court is a Joint Motion by the Parties for entry of a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). Having carefully considered the Joint Motion, the Parties request is GRANTED as follows:

The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information (“ESI”) or other information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yohe v. Safe Haven Sec. Servs.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
Jul 26, 2024
C. A. 4:23-cv-6796-JDA-TER (D.S.C. Jul. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Yohe v. Safe Haven Sec. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:STACEY L. YOHE, Plaintiff, v. SAFE HAVEN SECURITY SERVICES, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division

Date published: Jul 26, 2024

Citations

C. A. 4:23-cv-6796-JDA-TER (D.S.C. Jul. 26, 2024)