From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yinzhong Ge v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 16, 2024
24-cv-00241-DMR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-00241-DMR

04-16-2024

YINZHONG GE, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SERVICE OF COMPLAINT

Donna M. Ryu Chief Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Yinzhong Ge filed the complaint on January 12, 2024. It appears that the summons and complaint have not yet been served on Defendant. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court must dismiss an action without prejudice if a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing by no later than April 23, 2024 why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve the summons and complaint on Defendant.

The court notes that Plaintiff's counsel, David W. Ewing, has failed to timely serve the summons and complaint in several other cases where he is attorney of record.

See, e.g., Jiang v. Mayorkas et al, 3:23-cv-06181-CRB; Feng v. Mayorkas et al, 3:23-cv-06469-MMC; Xu v. Mayorkas et al, 3:24-cv-00138-EMC; Tang v. Mayorkas et al, 4:24-cv-00139-JST.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yinzhong Ge v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 16, 2024
24-cv-00241-DMR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Yinzhong Ge v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:YINZHONG GE, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 16, 2024

Citations

24-cv-00241-DMR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2024)