From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

YIN v. KIM

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 31, 2008
07 CV 1236 (DLI) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation and noting that "[t]he FLSA requires employers to pay their employees the statutory minimum wage as well as a premium (150 percent of the statutory minimum wage) for hours worked above 40 hours per week"

Summary of this case from Cocoletzi v. Fat Sal's Pizza II, Corp.

Opinion

07 CV 1236 (DLI) (JO).

March 31, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


It appears that no objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James Orenstein, U.S.M.J., dated March 7, 2008; and

On March 28, 2007, the plaintiff served a copy of the Report and Recommendation on the defendant by United States Postal Service certified mail, return receipt requested, on March 7, 2008. See Loncarevic Affidavit of Service. On March 27, 2008 the mailing was returned to the plaintiff from the Postal Service, with markings indicating that the mailing could not be delivered. See Letter from Pl.'s Counsel, Mar. 28, 2007.

Upon due consideration, the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted in full. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that default judgment be entered against An J. Kim in the amount of $3,027.25, comprised of $1,600.00 in unpaid regular wages, $330.54 in unpaid overtime premiums, $18.00 in "spread of hours" damages, $487.14 in liquidated damages (under state law only), and $591.57 in prejudgment interest. No attorneys' fees or other litigation costs shall be awarded. It is further hereby

ORDERED that service of a copy of this Order on An J. Kim shall be made by the plaintiff within five (5) days of the date of this Order, and proof thereof shall be filed with the court via ECF immediately thereafter.


Summaries of

YIN v. KIM

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Mar 31, 2008
07 CV 1236 (DLI) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008)

adopting report and recommendation and noting that "[t]he FLSA requires employers to pay their employees the statutory minimum wage as well as a premium (150 percent of the statutory minimum wage) for hours worked above 40 hours per week"

Summary of this case from Cocoletzi v. Fat Sal's Pizza II, Corp.

adopting report and recommendation and noting that "[t]he FLSA requires employers to pay their employees the statutory minimum wage as well as a premium (150 percent of the statutory minimum wage) for hours worked above 40 hours per week"

Summary of this case from Cocoletzi v. Fat Sal's Pizza II, Corp.

adopting report and recommendation and noting that "[t]he FLSA requires employers to pay their employees the statutory minimum wage as well as a premium (150 percent of the statutory minimum wage) for hours worked above 40 hours per week"

Summary of this case from Mercedes v. Tito Transmission Corp.

adopting report and recommendation and noting that "[t]he FLSA requires employers to pay their employees the statutory minimum wage as well as a premium (150 percent of the statutory minimum wage) for hours worked above 40 hours per week"

Summary of this case from Cabrera v. 1560 Chirp Corp.

adopting report and recommendation and noting that "[t]he FLSA requires employers to pay their employees the statutory minimum wage as well as a premium (150 percent of the statutory minimum wage) for hours worked above 40 hours per week"

Summary of this case from Flores v. Chirping Chicken NYC Inc.

adopting report and recommendation and noting that "[t]he FLSA requires employers to pay their employees the statutory minimum wage as well as a premium (150 percent of the statutory minimum wage) for hours worked above 40 hours per week"

Summary of this case from Kernes v. Global Structures, LLC

explaining that the N.Y. Lab. Law "mirrors the FLSA in compensation provisions regarding minimum hourly wages and overtime"

Summary of this case from Santana v. Rent a Throne, Inc.
Case details for

YIN v. KIM

Case Details

Full title:CHUN JIE YIN, Plaintiff, v. AN J. KIM, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2008

Citations

07 CV 1236 (DLI) (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Zubair v. Entech Eng'g P.C.

It should also be noted that district courts have disagreed on the question of whether a plaintiff may…

Yu Y. Ho v. Sim Enters., Inc.

Other courts have disagreed with the majority view, holding that "a plaintiff is not entitled to both federal…