From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yildiz v. Srivastava

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 25, 2024
CV 24-00406-JVS(KESx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-00406-JVS(KESx)

07-25-2024

Ozkurt Cihan Yildiz v. Saurabh Srivastava et al.


Present: The Honorable James V. Selna, U.S. District Court Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s) to Show Cause (OSC) in writing no later than August 2,2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above Dated:

___X Proof of service of summons and complaint

Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.

It is the plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.

It is so Ordered.


Summaries of

Yildiz v. Srivastava

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 25, 2024
CV 24-00406-JVS(KESx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Yildiz v. Srivastava

Case Details

Full title:Ozkurt Cihan Yildiz v. Saurabh Srivastava et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 25, 2024

Citations

CV 24-00406-JVS(KESx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2024)