finding identical protective safeguard endorsement unambiguous, and affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant where plaintiff's building did not have a sprinkler system
Summary of this case from Berenato v. Seneca Speciality Ins. Co.NO. 1398 EDA 2013
2014-04-22
YERA, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co.
Appeal From: 002141 (Philadelphia)
Disposition: Affirmed.
finding identical protective safeguard endorsement unambiguous, and affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant where plaintiff's building did not have a sprinkler system
Summary of this case from Berenato v. Seneca Speciality Ins. Co.In Yera, Inc. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., No. 1398 EDA 2013, 2014 WL 10936714, at *4 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 22, 2014), for example, the insurance policy at issue explicitly required that the insured maintain a sprinkler system covering the entire insured building.
Summary of this case from Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. 3327 W. 47th Place, LLCFull title:YERA, INC. Appellant v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…
Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Date published: Apr 22, 2014
Other jurisdictions have upheld similar provisions to the one at issue here. See Scottsdale Ins. Co. v.…
Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. 3327 W. 47th Place, LLCCourts often reject estoppel defenses where the policy clearly stated that coverage was excluded if the…