From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates v. Royale

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 17, 2015
No. 63181 (Nev. Apr. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 63181

04-17-2015

ELISABETH YATES; AND JERRY CHANEY, ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILD, ASHLEY CHANEY, Appellants, v. CASINO ROYALE, A DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court judgment on a short trial jury verdict in a tort action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge.

Appellants argue that the jury's verdict was contrary to the uncontroverted evidence, and thus, their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial should have been granted. Because appellants failed to provide the transcript from the trial, however, we presume that the testimony presented at trial supported the jury's verdict and the district court's determination that substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict. Cuzze v. Univ. & Cmty. Coll. Sys. of Nev., 123 Nev. 598, 603, 172 P.3d 131, 135 (2007) ("When an appellant fails to include necessary documentation in the record, we necessarily presume that the missing portion supports the district court's decision."). Thus, having considered the parties' arguments and appendices, we perceive no error in the jury's verdict or the district court's post-trial order. Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc., 125 Nev. 349, 362, 212 P.3d 1068, 1077 (2009) (reviewing a decision to grant or deny a motion for a new trial for abuse of discretion); Prabhu v. Levine, 112 Nev. 1538, 1543, 930 P.2d 103, 107 (1996) (holding that a jury's verdict will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence).

Appellants' argument that they should have prevailed on a negligence per se claim is without merit as that claim was never raised by appellants during trial or presented to the jury. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown, 97 Nev. 49, 52, 623 P.2d 981, 983 (1981).

Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Pickering
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge

Nathaniel J. Reed, Settlement Judge

Law Offices of Bradley L. Booke

Moriarity Badaruddin & Booke

Hutchison & Steffen, LLC

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Yates v. Royale

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 17, 2015
No. 63181 (Nev. Apr. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Yates v. Royale

Case Details

Full title:ELISABETH YATES; AND JERRY CHANEY, ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILD, ASHLEY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 17, 2015

Citations

No. 63181 (Nev. Apr. 17, 2015)