From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates-Mattingly v. Univ. of Cincinnati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
May 1, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-753 (S.D. Ohio May. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-753

05-01-2013

SHELIA YATES-MATTINGLY, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI et al., Defendants.


Judge Black


Magistrate Judge Litkovitz


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL OR

REDACT SUMMARY JUDGMENT PAPERS. DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS AND

DEPOSITION EXHIBITS

The parties' Joint Motion for Leave to File Under Seal or Redact Summary Judgment Papers, Deposition Transcripts and Deposition Exhibits is GRANTED. Parties will manually file under seal with the Clerk portions of deposition transcripts and deposition exhibits which are derived from "education records" protected from disclosure by the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C.S. § 1232g, or contain confidential medical or financial information. The parties will electronically file their summary judgment papers in redacted form, redacting only FERPA-protected or otherwise confidential medical or financial material, and manually file under seal with the Clerk unredacted versions of their summary judgment papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Yates-Mattingly v. Univ. of Cincinnati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
May 1, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-753 (S.D. Ohio May. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Yates-Mattingly v. Univ. of Cincinnati

Case Details

Full title:SHELIA YATES-MATTINGLY, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-753 (S.D. Ohio May. 1, 2013)