From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yarborough v. Alvarado

U.S.
Dec 1, 2003
540 U.S. 1043 (2003)

Summary

finding Brecht prejudice where confession obtained in violation of Miranda was admitted at trial even though defendant testified at trial; defendant's testimony could be disregarded because decision to testify was a tactical choice likely influenced by the prosecutor's use of the confession, and the remaining testimonial evidence was inconsistent or only marginally useful to the prosecution

Summary of this case from Cooper v. McGrath

Opinion

No. 02-1684.

DECEMBER 1, 2003.


C.A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 539 U. S. 986.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted, and Tara K. Allen, Esq, of Malibu, Cal, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.


Summaries of

Yarborough v. Alvarado

U.S.
Dec 1, 2003
540 U.S. 1043 (2003)

finding Brecht prejudice where confession obtained in violation of Miranda was admitted at trial even though defendant testified at trial; defendant's testimony could be disregarded because decision to testify was a tactical choice likely influenced by the prosecutor's use of the confession, and the remaining testimonial evidence was inconsistent or only marginally useful to the prosecution

Summary of this case from Cooper v. McGrath
Case details for

Yarborough v. Alvarado

Case Details

Full title:YARBOROUGH, WARDEN v. ALVARADO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 1, 2003

Citations

540 U.S. 1043 (2003)

Citing Cases

State v. Turner

Specifically, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently concluded that the…

Cooper v. McGrath

The error must have resulted in "actual prejudice." Id. (citation omitted); see, e.g., Alvarado v. Hickman,…