From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yancey v. Conway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502310.

December 13, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Raymond Yancey, Moravia, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


A search of petitioner's prison cell resulted in the discovery of an ice-pick type weapon and a quantity of marihuana. Consequently, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a weapon and possession of drugs. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. Upon administrative review, that determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence including the detailed misbehavior report and extensive hearing testimony ( see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 27 AD3d 859, 860). Petitioner's allegation that the contraband had been "planted" in his cell by a correction officer created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Nijman v Goord, 294 AD2d 737, 737). As for petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased, it is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of McKinley v Goord, 40 AD3d 1280, 1280, lv denied 9 NY3d 807). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that his cell was improperly searched, the misbehavior report was deficient and the chain of custody relative to the marihuana was not appropriately established, and find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Yancey v. Conway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Yancey v. Conway

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND YANCEY, Petitioner, v. JAMES CONWAY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9837
847 N.Y.S.2d 282

Citing Cases

Warren v. Fischer

We are unpersuaded by petitioner's claim that he was improperly denied certain witnesses given that their…

Shorter v. Prack

The misbehavior report, the positive test results and related documentation, and the testimony of the…