From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yacht v. Italian Welfare League, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1994
200 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.).


The trial court properly concluded that no triable issues of fact exist. It is not disputed that the president of Italian National Magazine Co., Inc., doing business as La Follia, and the president of The Italian Welfare League, Inc. (IWL) signed an agreement that stated "[a]ll proceeds and expenses divided down the middle". Since there is no claim that La Follia's president could not have read and understood this language before signing, the agreement is binding (see, Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 73 N.Y.2d 1, 11). Moreover, in contending that it had not intended to enter into a financial arrangement with IWL, La Follia offers only unsubstantiated assertions that the contractual elements of offer, acceptance and consideration were lacking and that more pre-trial discovery was needed.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Yacht v. Italian Welfare League, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1994
200 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Yacht v. Italian Welfare League, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WORLD YACHT, Plaintiff, v. ITALIAN WELFARE LEAGUE, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 689

Citing Cases

Sudul v. Computer Outsourcing Services, Inc.

24. Generally, a party signing an agreement is bound by the provisions of such writing. See Gillman v. Chase…

Friedman v. Fife

However, plaintiff subsequently signed a stock restriction agreement providing that one-half of his stock…