Opinion
3:14-cv-00295-MMD-WGC
12-07-2022
DONALD STEPHEN YAAG, Petitioner, v. TIM GARRETT,[1] et al., Respondents.
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Respondents filed a motion (first request) for enlargement of time to respond to Petitioner Donald Stephen Yaag's motion for, inter alia, Rule 60(b)(6) review (ECF No. 95 (“Motion”)). Yaag did not file an opposition to the request. The Court finds that the request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. Thus, good cause exists to grant the Motion.
It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 95) is granted. Respondents have until January 30, 2023, to respond to Yaag's motion (ECF No. 94).
The Clerk of Court is directed to substitute Tim Garrett for Respondent Renee Baker.