From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

X Corp. v. Ernst & Young, LLP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 16, 2023
23-mc-80245-TSH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2023)

Opinion

23-mc-80245-TSH

11-16-2023

X CORP., Plaintiff, v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, Defendant.


DISCOVERY ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 1

THOMAS S. HIXSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

We are here on a motion to compel brought by X Corp. against Ernst & Young, LLP (“EY”) seeking discovery to use in support of X Corp.'s motion to terminate or modify the May 26, 2022 Stipulated Order in the underlying action United States v. Twitter, Inc., No. 22-cv-3070. However, in the underlying action the Court determined that X Corp.'s motion was deficient as a matter of law and that no discovery was needed to make that determination. Accordingly, the subpoena to EY serves no judicial purpose, and the motion to compel is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

X Corp. v. Ernst & Young, LLP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 16, 2023
23-mc-80245-TSH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2023)
Case details for

X Corp. v. Ernst & Young, LLP

Case Details

Full title:X CORP., Plaintiff, v. ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 16, 2023

Citations

23-mc-80245-TSH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2023)