From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wysocki v. Kugel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 27, 1954
120 N.E.2d 839 (N.Y. 1954)

Opinion

Argued April 14, 1954

Decided May 27, 1954

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, ALONZO G. HINKLEY, Off. Ref.

Larue Z. Brown for appellant.

Leonard N. Lakser and Theodore J. Vogt for Helen Kugel and another, respondents.

Elmer R. Weil, County Attorney ( Maurice J. Rumizen of counsel), for County of Erie, respondent.



Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ.


Summaries of

Wysocki v. Kugel

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 27, 1954
120 N.E.2d 839 (N.Y. 1954)
Case details for

Wysocki v. Kugel

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY WYSOCKI, Appellant, v. HELEN KUGEL et al., Respondents, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 27, 1954

Citations

120 N.E.2d 839 (N.Y. 1954)
120 N.E.2d 839

Citing Cases

Waterview Towers, Inc. v. 2610 Cropsey Dev. Corp.

Based on the credible weight of the evidence, the Court finds that Centre Place is a private, mapped street.…

Waterview Towers, Inc. v. 2610 Cropsey Dev. Corp.

Based on the credible weight of the evidence, the Court finds that Centre Place is a private, mapped…