From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wyrick v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 2, 2010
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00207 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00207.

March 2, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


On February 8, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss this action as barred by the one-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), Doc. No. 9, be GRANTED. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Court notes that notification of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable, with no forwarding address. See Doc. No. 14. However, it is the petitioner's responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current whereabouts.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Respondent's motion to dismiss this action as time-barred, Doc. No. 9, is GRANTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wyrick v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 2, 2010
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00207 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Wyrick v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH WYRICK, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00207 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2010)