From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wynter v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2020
19 CIVIL 5592 (AT)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 5592 (AT)(RWL)

09-18-2020

Diana Wynter, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 18, 2020, the R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED to the administrative law judge pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ should further develop the record to ascertain the identity of the physician who completed the currently unattributed medical source opinion from Montefiore Medical Center. Further, notwithstanding the absence of error with respect to the other arguments raised by Plaintiff, the ALJ should reconsider all aspects of her determination in light of any new information received; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

September 18, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Wynter v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 18, 2020
19 CIVIL 5592 (AT)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Wynter v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Diana Wynter, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 18, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 5592 (AT)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2020)

Citing Cases

Love v. Kijakazi

As discussed above, however, the ALJ properly determined that Plaintiff's “subjective statements were not…