From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wynns v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1921
106 S.E. 136 (N.C. 1921)

Opinion

(Filed 2 March, 1921.)

APPEAL by defendant from Lyon, J., at November Term, 1920, of BERTIE.

Civil action for damages, tried upon an alleged negligent injury to plaintiff's two mules. Verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants appealed.

Winston Matthews for plaintiff.

J. N. Pruden and Gillam Davenport for defendants.


Upon the argument of this cause, defendants relied entirely upon their motion for judgment as of nonsuit, assigning as error his Honor's refusal to grant the same. Considering the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on such motion, we think the testimony was sufficient to be submitted to the jury, under authority of Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N.C. 38.

No error.


Summaries of

Wynns v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1921
106 S.E. 136 (N.C. 1921)
Case details for

Wynns v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:F. M. WYNNS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1921

Citations

106 S.E. 136 (N.C. 1921)
106 S.E. 136