From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wynn v. Raji

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04790.

Decided May 10, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated May 14, 2003, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Tracey M. Wynn did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Lebit Fruchter, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Joseph B. Fruchter and Robin Mary Heaney of counsel), for appellants.

Norman Volk Associates, New York, N.Y. (Holly E. Peck of counsel), for respondents.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Tracey M. Wynn did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident ( see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955). Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been denied.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wynn v. Raji

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Wynn v. Raji

Case Details

Full title:TRACEY M. WYNN, ET AL., appellants, v. LEDHOUD RAJI, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 895