Opinion
Case No. 3:12-cv-559
07-09-2012
ORDER:
Motion granted.
________________
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Judge Nixon
Magistrate Judge Knowles
JURY DEMAND
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
COMES NOW Plaintiff, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., ("Wyndham") by and through its counsel, and, pursuant to Local Rule 7.01(b), and files this Motion for Leave to File a Reply to respond to the issues and arguments raised by Defendants in their Response, Doc. 10, to Wyndham's Motion for Expedited Discovery, and states as follows:
As fully set forth in its Reply, attached hereto as Exhibit A, Wyndham seeks to respond to issues and arguments raised by Defendants, specifically Defendants' claim that they have not engaged in any wrongful behavior and would suffer hardship if expedited discovery was authorized because Defendant Charles McDowell, III is facing another related civil trial beginning on July 17, 2012. Wyndham seeks to show McDowell, a former Wyndham employee, has engaged in a pattern of wrongfully exploiting Wyndham's trade secrets and confidential information, interfering with Wyndham's contractual and business relations, and violating Tennessee's prohibition of the unauthorized practice of law and that McDowell is facing trial