Opinion
CIVIL 4:22-CV-02923
05-15-2023
GERY GARNNETT WYCHE, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, WAYNE E. REVACK, ROBERT D WENDELL, JAMES K. ELSTON, LISA BAYLOR, CHANTEL GARZA, CHRISTOPHER MEYER, PAPA M. DIEYE, ROBIN SCOTT, GREGORY E LUCIA, KENDRA L. JEFFERSON and MICKEL NEWTON, JR., Defendants.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court is the April 7, 2023 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Dkt. No. 28). Judge Bray made findings and conclusions and recommended that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, (Dkt. Nos. 19, 21, 22, 23, and 26), be granted. (Dkt. No. 28).
The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears.
Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that:
(1) Judge Bray's M&R (Dkt. No. 28) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, (Dkt. Nos. 19, 21, 22, 23, and 26), are GRANTED.
It is SO ORDERED.