From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wurst v. Spence

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 18, 2003
121 S.W.3d 253 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 82386

November 18, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Honorable Troy K. Hyde.

William B. Beedie, Farmington, MO, for appellant.

Louis Jerry Weber, Hillsboro, MO, for respondent.

Before Booker T. Shaw, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Thomas Spence, Jr. ("Seller") appeals the judgment awarding damages to Randy and Pamela Wurst ("Buyers") for fraudulent misrepresentation in the sale of real property. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Buyers' motion for an award of additional attorney's fees incurred on appeal is sustained. Buyers are awarded an additional $6,615.00 as and for their attorneys fees incurred on appeal.


Summaries of

Wurst v. Spence

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 18, 2003
121 S.W.3d 253 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Wurst v. Spence

Case Details

Full title:RANDY R. WURST and PAMELA K. WURST, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. THOMAS D…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Nov 18, 2003

Citations

121 S.W.3d 253 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)