From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wunner v. Smith

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2021
21 CV 1865 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21 CV 1865 (VB)

09-15-2021

JONTE ANDREW WUNNER, Plaintiff, v. CHIEF H. SMITH, CAPTAIN J. GINTY, LIEUTENANT C. BINI, SERGEANT C. ZAYAS, SERGEANT M. SHENE, CORPORAL J. WILCOX, DEPUTY M. GORR, DEPUTY SAWALL, DEPUTY S. CUNNINGHAM, Defendants.


ORDER

VINCENT L. BRICCETTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 14, 2021, defendant Zayas moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and mailed to plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, copies of the motion and supporting documents. (Doc. #29). The motion was mailed to plaintiff at the Sullivan County Jail and Fishkill Correctional Facility. (Doc. #29-1, at 17). Plaintiff's opposition to the motion was due July 1, 2021. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d); Local Civil Rule 6.1(b). On June 15, 2021, the Court sua sponte extended the deadline for plaintiff to oppose the motion to July 26, 2021. (Doc. #30).

On June 18, 2021, defendants Smith, Ginty, Bini, and Cunningham separately moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. #31). Counsel for these defendants informed the Court by letter dated July 14, 2021, that plaintiff was served with their motion to dismiss by mailing a copy of the motion papers to plaintiff at the Fishkill Correctional Facility. (Doc. #38).

On July 14, 2021, the Court instructed plaintiff to file a single opposition to both motions to dismiss by September 3, 2021. (Doc. #40).

Further, the Court instructed the Clerk to update plaintiff's address on the docket to the Fishkill Correctional Facility. (Doc. #40).

To date, plaintiff has failed to oppose the motions or seek an extension of time to do so.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED:

The Court sua sponte extends to October 15, 2021, plaintiff's time to oppose the motions to dismiss. If plaintiff fails to respond to the motions by October 15, 2021, the motions will be deemed fully submitted and unopposed.

If plaintiff opposes the motions, defendants' replies, if any, shall be due October 22, 2021.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States. 369 U.S. 438, 444-15 (1962).

Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Plaintiff is reminded of his obligation to update the Court in writing as to any change of his address, and that his failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this case.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Wunner v. Smith

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 15, 2021
21 CV 1865 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Wunner v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JONTE ANDREW WUNNER, Plaintiff, v. CHIEF H. SMITH, CAPTAIN J. GINTY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

21 CV 1865 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2021)