From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wueppesahl v. Connecticut Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District
Dec 29, 1913
89 A. 166 (Conn. 1913)

Opinion

Argued October 29th, 1913

Decided December 29th, 1913.

ACTION to recover damages for injuries to the plaintiff's wagon, and for the loss of the services of the plaintiff's minor son resulting from personal injuries to him, and for medical expenses incurred in his behalf, all alleged to have been caused by the defendant's negligence, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Bennett, J.; the court directed a verdict for the defendant, from the judgment upon which the plaintiff appealed. No error.

The parties agreed that the decision of this court in this case should control and dispose of the case of the son, William, against the Connecticut Company, the two causes having been tried together in the court below and argued on one brief in this court.

Walter J. Walsh, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Thomas M. Steele and Harrison T. Sheldon, for the appellee (defendant).


The injuries for which recovery is sought were received while the plaintiff's son was driving the plaintiff's horse and wagon, and were occasioned by a collision between the defendant's trolley-car and the wagon. Upon the evidence the jury could not reasonably have found that the son was free from contributory negligence, and the situation is not one in which the doctrine of the last clear chance can be successfully invoked. The verdict for the defendant was, therefore, properly directed.


Summaries of

Wueppesahl v. Connecticut Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District
Dec 29, 1913
89 A. 166 (Conn. 1913)
Case details for

Wueppesahl v. Connecticut Co.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE D. WUEPPESAHL vs. THE CONNECTICUT COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District

Date published: Dec 29, 1913

Citations

89 A. 166 (Conn. 1913)
89 A. 166

Citing Cases

Shiels v. Audette

Thibeault v. Poole, 283 Mass. 480, 485, 186 N.E. 632. This principle prevails generally. Callies v. Reliance…

Trapeni v. Walker

In each of the companion cases, Farrell v. Greene, 110 Vt. 92, 93, 2 A.2d 196, and McKirryher v. Yager, 112…