From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wu v. Bitfloor, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 18, 2020
19 CIVIL238 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL238 (RA)

05-18-2020

VINCENT WU, DYLAN ARANA, GRIFFIN BRANHAM, KEITH DEZMIN, PHIL MAY, DANIEL MCBRIDE, JEFF O'TOOLE, ADAM PATTACHIOLA, SEONG-YOUP SUH, JOHN TWIGG, THOMAS WEILAND and KELLY WILLIAMS SCHELL, Plaintiffs, v. BITFLOOR, INC. and ROMAN SHTYLMAN, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 15, 2020, the Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss the CEA claim as time-barred and declines to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state law claims, accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

May 18, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Wu v. Bitfloor, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 18, 2020
19 CIVIL238 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Wu v. Bitfloor, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT WU, DYLAN ARANA, GRIFFIN BRANHAM, KEITH DEZMIN, PHIL MAY, DANIEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 18, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL238 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2020)