From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 21, 1987
516 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-199.

November 3, 1987. Rehearing Denied December 21, 1987.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Robert H. Newman, Judge.

Fred E. Glickman, Miami, for appellant.

Richard W. Aschenbrenner, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's order finding that the report of the general master is supported by competent evidence. See Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) ("A trial court is bound by a master's factual findings when they are supported by competent evidence."); Shaw v. Shaw, 369 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (trial court must uphold master's findings unless report was clearly erroneous or master misconceived legal effect of evidence).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Wright v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 21, 1987
516 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Wright v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:MILLARD B. WRIGHT, APPELLANT, v. CECELIA S. WRIGHT, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 21, 1987

Citations

516 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Cerase v. Dewhurst

Thus, where exceptions to a magistrate's report and recommendation have been filed, a trial court reviews the…