From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Symms

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 1, 2010
Civil No. 10-517 (MJD/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-517 (MJD/FLN).

June 1, 2010


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon Petitioner's objection to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated March 18, 2010.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation dated March 18, 2010.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED;
2. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED;
3. Petitioner's Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing [Doc. No. 3} is DENIED; and
4. This action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Wright v. Symms

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 1, 2010
Civil No. 10-517 (MJD/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Wright v. Symms

Case Details

Full title:Eric Maurice Wright, Petitioner, v. Jessica Symms — Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jun 1, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-517 (MJD/FLN) (D. Minn. Jun. 1, 2010)