From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 6, 2000
765 So. 2d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 1D98-1141

September 6, 2000.

An appeal from Circuit Court for Duval County. Brad Stetson, Judge.

Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Following his conviction for robbery with a firearm, the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment as a prison releasee reoffender and as a habitual felony offender. We reject the appellant's constitutional challenges to the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act, section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997). See State v. Cotton, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S463 ___ So.2d ___, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000). But we agree with his further argument that, in light of our decision in Walls v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1221 (Fla. 1st DCA May 17, 2000), it was improper to impose appellant's life sentence under both the habitual felony offender statute and the prison releasee reoffender statute. Accordingly, we strike the habitual felony offender designation.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 6, 2000
765 So. 2d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 6, 2000

Citations

765 So. 2d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Miller v. State

Because the court was not authorized to sentence appellant to a life sentence under both the habitual felony…