From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Snowball

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1873
45 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1873)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, County of Yolo.

         The defendant had judgment in an action to abate a nuisance, and the plaintiff appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         C. P. Sprague, for Appellant.

          Creed Haymond, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         By the Court:

         The appeal is taken only from the order denying the plaintiff's motion for a new trial. It nowhere appears that a notice of intention to move for a new trial was given by the appellant or waived by the respondent by appearance to the motion, or in any other manner, and it is objected, and we think well objected, by the respondent, that in the absence of such a notice or waiver, the order denying a new trial cannot be reviewed here.

         Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Wright v. Snowball

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1873
45 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1873)
Case details for

Wright v. Snowball

Case Details

Full title:WRIGHT v. SNOWBALL

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1873

Citations

45 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1873)

Citing Cases

Pico v. Cohn

It has been held by this court in a number of cases that it must be made to appear by the statement that a…