From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WRIGHT v. RHAY

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 14, 1963
323 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 18808.

October 10, 1963. Rehearing Denied November 14, 1963.

J.S. Applegate, Yakima, Wash., for appellant.

John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Washington, for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY, District Judge.


Appellant would have us liberate him from the Washington State Penitentiary on the theory that the Washington Supreme Court is ill advised on the construction of its own State statutes and Constitution. The precise issues before us were decided adversely to appellant's contentions by that Court when it denied his application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. There being no issue of due process under the Federal Constitution, we must not challenge the State Court's construction of its own statutes and Constitution, nor should we inquire into the reasons for such construction. Hebert v. Louisiana (1926), 272 U.S. 312, 47 S.Ct. 103, 71 L.Ed. 270; Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507, 68 S.Ct. 665, 92 L.Ed. 840.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

WRIGHT v. RHAY

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 14, 1963
323 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1963)
Case details for

WRIGHT v. RHAY

Case Details

Full title:William Clyde WRIGHT, Appellant, v. B.J. RHAY, Superintendent of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 1963

Citations

323 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

United States ex rel. Nersesian v. Fay

See N Y Proposed Penal Law § 30.10 pp. 284-86 (1964). Cf. Wright v. Rhay, 323 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1963), cert.…

Stiltner v. Rhay

We accept the state court's decision that petitioner was properly sentenced to a maximum confinement of…