From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Phelan, Hallinan Schmieg, LLP

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3538 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 2010)

Summary

concluding letter directed to debtor's attorney was not actionable under FDCPA and noting "[t]he letter was not addressed to plaintiff, nor it did contain any threat to contact plaintiff directly"

Summary of this case from Plumb v. Prof'l Account Servs.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3538.

March 8, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of defendant's Motion to Dismiss and plaintiff's Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Move for Class Certification (Doc. 7) is DENIED as moot;
3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and
4. The Clerk shall mark the case as CLOSED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Phelan, Hallinan Schmieg, LLP

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3538 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 2010)

concluding letter directed to debtor's attorney was not actionable under FDCPA and noting "[t]he letter was not addressed to plaintiff, nor it did contain any threat to contact plaintiff directly"

Summary of this case from Plumb v. Prof'l Account Servs.
Case details for

Wright v. Phelan, Hallinan Schmieg, LLP

Case Details

Full title:JOAN M. WRIGHT on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 8, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3538 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co. v. Harris

We may consider the Complaint filed in Harris v. Allstate in connection with the instant Motion because it is…

Villegas v. Weinstein Riley, P.S.

In support, Defendant points to cases from the Ninth Circuit, Guerrrero v. RJM Acquisitions LLC, 499 F.3d 926…