From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 16, 2017
3:16-cv-00755-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2017)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00755-RCJ-WGC

02-16-2017

DASHAUN WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On December 27, 2016, Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, initiated this case by filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1, 1-1). On January 3, 2017, the Court denied the application to proceed in forma pauperis , without prejudice, as incomplete. (ECF No. 4). In that order, the Court noted that Plaintiff may have filed the case in this Court in error. (Id. at 2). The Court noted that Plaintiff's documents all contained the caption "In the 7 Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada in and for the County of White Pine." (Id.) The Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, pay the full $400 filing fee, or file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case if filed in error. (Id.)

On January 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to have his complaint struck from the record (ECF No. 5). The Court interprets this motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss his case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing "a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss this action because no responsive pleading has been filed in this case. As such, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Court interprets Plaintiff's motion to have his complaint struck from the record (ECF No. 5) as a motion for voluntary dismissal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 5) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of his complaint (ECF No. 1-1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

Dated: This 16 day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wright v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 16, 2017
3:16-cv-00755-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Wright v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:DASHAUN WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 16, 2017

Citations

3:16-cv-00755-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2017)