From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Mohr

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 29, 2017
CASE NO. 1D16-4749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D16-4749

03-29-2017

CHARLES MCGEE WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. MARISSA B. MOHR, Respondent.

Gregory D. Smith of Gregory D. Smith, P.A., Pensacola and Craig A. Vigodsky, Pensacola, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Petition for Writ of Certiorari - Original Jurisdiction. Gregory D. Smith of Gregory D. Smith, P.A., Pensacola and Craig A. Vigodsky, Pensacola, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied on the merits. See State, Dept. of Rev. ex rel. Martin v. Bradley, 774 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Wright v. Mohr

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 29, 2017
CASE NO. 1D16-4749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Wright v. Mohr

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES MCGEE WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. MARISSA B. MOHR, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 29, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 1D16-4749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2017)