From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WRIGHT v. DI MILIA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

October, 1932.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, requiring defendants to give the particulars demanded, or if they are not in possession of such particulars, to so state and likewise to state that they intend to rely upon the testimony of the plaintiff's witnesses on the issue of contributory negligence. ( Dunson v. Kirtland, 235 App. Div. 854.) The particulars, or the statement in lieu thereof, shall be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

WRIGHT v. DI MILIA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

WRIGHT v. DI MILIA

Case Details

Full title:CHRYSTINA WRIGHT, as Administratrix, etc., of CHARLES WRIGHT, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Heddy v. Dairymen's League Co-operative Ass'n

Defendants, upon whom rests the burden of proof as to contributory negligence, should not be required to…

Anton v. Boal

As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, and the defendant's time to comply herewith is…