From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WRIGHT v. COX

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 22, 2010
Case No. 3:10-cv-201, consolidated with Case No. 3:10-cv-286 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 22, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cv-201, consolidated with Case No. 3:10-cv-286.

December 22, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #41), to whom these cases were referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 38) is moot and the Complaints filed in both cases are dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

December 22, 2010.

Exhibit


Summaries of

WRIGHT v. COX

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 22, 2010
Case No. 3:10-cv-201, consolidated with Case No. 3:10-cv-286 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 22, 2010)
Case details for

WRIGHT v. COX

Case Details

Full title:RANDY LEE WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES COX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Dec 22, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cv-201, consolidated with Case No. 3:10-cv-286 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 22, 2010)