From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. City of Cincinnati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 27, 2013
C-1-12-631 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

C-1-12-631

02-27-2013

JASMINE WRIGHT, Plaintiff v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, Defendant


ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 4) to which neither party has objected. The Report and Recommendation was mailed to plaintiff on January 23, 2013 by certified mail. On February 19, 2013, it was returned to the Clerk of Courts marked "Return to Sender/Unclaimed/Unable to Forward."

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 4) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Plaintiff's Complaint (doc. no. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution.

The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997).

This case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Wright v. City of Cincinnati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 27, 2013
C-1-12-631 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Wright v. City of Cincinnati

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE WRIGHT, Plaintiff v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

C-1-12-631 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2013)