From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Benik

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Jun 13, 2006
Case No. 04-C-1074 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 04-C-1074.

June 13, 2006.


ORDER


On November 4, 2004, the petitioner, Tommie Wright, filed apro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and § 2254. The respondent filed an answer to the petition on December 9, 2004.

On February 23, 2006, appointed counsel for the petitioner filed a No Merit Report and Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Docket #28). The court granted counsel's motion and entered a briefing schedule. Pursuant to the briefing schedule, the petitioner was to file his brief in support of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on or before April 24, 2006.

On June 6, 2006, the respondent filed a motion to compel and to stay the briefing schedule. By his motion the respondent moves the court for an order compelling the petitioner to inform the court and the respondent whether he intends to continue to prosecute his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The respondent also seeks an order staying the briefing schedule in this case.

To date, the petitioner has not filed his brief. Thus, by this order, the court amends the scheduling order. Accordingly, the respondent's motion to compel and to stay the briefing schedule is denied to the extent that it seeks an order compelling the petitioner to inform the court whether he intends to prosecute this action and to the extent it seeks a stay in the briefing schedule.

Nevertheless, the court will give the petitioner additional time to file his brief. The petitioner is hereby advised that, if he fails to file a brief in support of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on or before July 11, 2006, this action may be dismissed with prejudice for lack of diligence in prosecuting this case pursuant to Civil Local Rule 41.3 (E.D. Wis.) (copy enclosed).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the scheduling order in this case be and hereby is amended as follows. The petitioner shall file his brief in support of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on or before July 11, 2006. The respondent's brief shall be filed on or before July 25, 2006, and the petitioner's reply brief shall be filed by August 8, 2006, Failure to file such a response may result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Civil L.R. 41.3.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent's motion to compel and to stay the briefing schedule is denied. (Docket # 31).

FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that respondent Pamela Wallace, warden at Stanley Correctional Institution, be and hereby is substituted in place of Daniel Benik.


Summaries of

Wright v. Benik

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Jun 13, 2006
Case No. 04-C-1074 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Wright v. Benik

Case Details

Full title:TOMMIE WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. DAN BENIK, Warden, Stanley Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 13, 2006

Citations

Case No. 04-C-1074 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 13, 2006)