From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Jan 11, 2012
1:11-0039 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-0039

01-11-2012

BRENDA C. WRIGHT, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security


ORDER

The Court has read and considered Defendant's Motion For Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), With Remand To Defendant, Document #16, and Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion, Document #17. No objections have been filed by Plaintiff.

Defendant's Motion For Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), With Remand To Defendant, Document #16, is GRANTED, and this case is reversed and remanded for proper application of the Dennard and Drummond Acquiescence Rulings 98-3(6) and 98-4(6); further consideration of Dr. Gale's medical opinion; further evaluation of claimant's alleged mental condition, particularly with respect to the severity of the post-traumatic stress disorder and dependent personality disorder; and to obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony in accordance with Agency policy.

It is so ORDERED.

_____________

Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr.

Senior U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Wright v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Jan 11, 2012
1:11-0039 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Wright v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA C. WRIGHT, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

1:11-0039 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 11, 2012)