From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

W.P. v. Verniero

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Sep 17, 1997
127 F.3d 298 (3d Cir. 1997)

Opinion

No. 96-5416.

September 17, 1997.

Before SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges.



SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellants in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Judge Becker would have granted rehearing.


Summaries of

W.P. v. Verniero

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Sep 17, 1997
127 F.3d 298 (3d Cir. 1997)
Case details for

W.P. v. Verniero

Case Details

Full title:W.P., ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF A CLASS PURSUANT TO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Sep 17, 1997

Citations

127 F.3d 298 (3d Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Roe v. Farwell

The decisions of those courts are referred to herein where useful in this analysis. See Doe v. Pataki, 120…