From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worthy v. Accumarine Transportation

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jul 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00664-WS-N (S.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00664-WS-N.

July 29, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated May 11, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with the Court's Order.


Summaries of

Worthy v. Accumarine Transportation

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jul 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00664-WS-N (S.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Worthy v. Accumarine Transportation

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WORTHY, Plaintiff, v. ACCUMARINE TRANSPORTATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 29, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00664-WS-N (S.D. Ala. Jul. 29, 2010)

Citing Cases

Simpson v. Sapphire Bay Condominiums W. Bd. of Dirs.

In the instant case, the action has been dormant for more than three years and no party or legal successor…

Alvarez v. San Juan Va Med. Ctr.

In the instant case, the action has been dormant for three years and no party or legal successor has filed a…