From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worth v. Sugar Feed Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1917
91 S.E. 856 (N.C. 1917)

Opinion

(Filed 28 March, 1917.)

CIVIL ACTION, tried at December Term, 1916, of NEW HANOVER, before Connor, J., upon these issues:

J. O. Carr, Rountree Davis for plaintiff.

John D. Bellamy Son and Emmett Bellamy for intervenor.


1. What amount, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover of defendant feed company? Answer: "$106.50, with interest."

2. Is the intervenor, Bank of Commerce and Trust Company, owner of the proceeds of the draft offered in evidence, and entitled to possession of same? Answer: "No."

From the judgment rendered the intervenor appealed.


This case was before us at last term, 172 N.C. 335. The questions of law involved are fully discussed in the opinion of the Court. A new trial was directed. The second issue was properly submitted and there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict.

The case appears to have been tried in full accord with our opinion.

No error.

Cited: Bank v. Rochamora, 193 N.C. 7.


Summaries of

Worth v. Sugar Feed Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1917
91 S.E. 856 (N.C. 1917)
Case details for

Worth v. Sugar Feed Co.

Case Details

Full title:THE WORTH COMPANY v. INTERNATIONAL SUGAR FEED COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1917

Citations

91 S.E. 856 (N.C. 1917)
173 N.C. 711