Opinion
22-1942
03-20-2023
MICHAEL C. WORSHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DISCOUNT POWER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Michael Craig Worsham, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Adam Scotti, GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: March 16, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00008-RDB)
Michael Craig Worsham, Appellant Pro Se.
Brian Adam Scotti, GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael C. Worsham appeals from the district court's orders entering judgment in favor of Discount Power, Inc. ("Discount Power"), in his action alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, and the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 14-3201 to 14-3202. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Worsham's motion to direct the district court to transmit evidence to this court, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Worsham v. Disc. Power, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-00008-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 1, 2021; Aug. 4, 2022). We deny Worsham's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED