From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worrell v. Adams

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Bluefield
Aug 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:04-0679 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:04-0679.

August 14, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On July 6, 2004, petitioner filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 contending a term of incarceration that was imposed upon her on June 17, 2003, was unconstitutional. (See Doc. No. 2 at 2.) Petitioner argues that the Bureau of Prisons unlawfully computed her sentence by not applying certain statutory early release criteria. (See id. at 7.)

By Standing Order, this case was initially referred to a magistrate judge for preparation of proposed findings and recommendation as to disposition. (Doc. No. 4.) To expedite this case's disposition, the court hereby VACATES the Standing Order, only as applied to this case.

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) directs courts to review complaints filed by prisoners against the government "before docketing, if feasible or . . . as soon as practicable after docketing" to ascertain whether they contain valid claims. Section 1915A(b)(1) directs the court to dismiss any complaint, or portions of any complaint, which contain claims that are "frivolous, malicious, or fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."Id.

However, petitioner was only sentenced to a 24-month term of incarceration. (See Doc. No. 2 at 1.) A search of the records of the Bureau of Prisons indicates that petitioner has been released as of the date of this opinion. Petitioner's case must fail because she has been released from prison. As such, by accompanying Judgment Order, petitioner's claim seeking release from prison is moot, and must be dismissed. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998) (holding that a "collateral consequence" of conviction must exist after a prisoner's release in order for her to continue to maintain a challenge to her confinement); Lopez v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2006 WL 219607, *1 (D.P.R. 2006). As such, petitioner's claim must be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

Because this case fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, in an accompanying Judgment Order, the court: (1) DISMISSES petitioner's writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 2); and (2) DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this action from the active docket of this court and to forward a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record and the petitioner, pro se.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Worrell v. Adams

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Bluefield
Aug 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:04-0679 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Worrell v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA P. WORRELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN VANESSA ADAMS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Bluefield

Date published: Aug 14, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:04-0679 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 14, 2006)