From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Workman v. Bowland

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Jan 4, 2017
No. 08-16-00137-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2017)

Opinion

No. 08-16-00137-CV

01-04-2017

MARCHELLE WORKMAN, Appellant, v. RAIN BOWLAND, Appellee.


Appeal from County Court of Jack County, Texas (TC # CV1996) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Marchelle Workman, has failed to file her brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that her brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has not filed any response to the inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). January 4, 2017

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Hughes, J., not participating


Summaries of

Workman v. Bowland

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Jan 4, 2017
No. 08-16-00137-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Workman v. Bowland

Case Details

Full title:MARCHELLE WORKMAN, Appellant, v. RAIN BOWLAND, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Date published: Jan 4, 2017

Citations

No. 08-16-00137-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2017)