From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Work v. Phung

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 4, 2012
173 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2012)

Opinion

No. 86479–9.

2012-01-4

Mini–Dozer WORK, Wayne R. Richardson, Petitioners, v. LINH NGUYEN PHUNG, Respondent.


Prior report: 162 Wash.App. 1055, 2011 WL 2993078.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Owens, J.M. Johnson and Wiggins, considered at its January 4, 2012, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Respondent's motion to strike and dismiss the petition for review is denied. The Petition for Review is denied. The Respondent's request for attorney fees as a sanction is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.9(a). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Work v. Phung

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 4, 2012
173 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2012)
Case details for

Work v. Phung

Case Details

Full title:Mini–Dozer WORK, Wayne R. Richardson, Petitioners, v. LINH NGUYEN PHUNG…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

173 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2012)
173 Wn. 2d 1009
173 Wash. 2d 1009