From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Work v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Oct 17, 2014
No. 6:13-cv-597-CL (D. Or. Oct. 17, 2014)

Opinion

No. 6:13-cv-597-CL

10-17-2014

LEON G. WORK, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN L. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th. Cir. 1983).

I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the ALJ's conclusion was supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#28) is adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 17 day of October, 2014.

/s/_________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Work v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Oct 17, 2014
No. 6:13-cv-597-CL (D. Or. Oct. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Work v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:LEON G. WORK, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN L. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 17, 2014

Citations

No. 6:13-cv-597-CL (D. Or. Oct. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Berryhill

The ALJ also observed that no treatment notes from Ms. Black or Dr. Kifune document any of the alleged…